Nine Sri Lankan asylum-seekers protest on the roof of the Villawood detention centre near Sydney on September 21, 2010
The UN refugee agency took Australia to task Wednesday over a tough new policy that allows boat people who reach its mainland to be sent to remote Nauru or Papua New Guinea for detention while their asylum claims are processed.
The so-called “excision” rules, passed last week, extend previous legislation which only allowed the authorities to send boat people for detention in the Pacific nations if they reached Australian offshore territories.
The office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees said that the approach was at best wrong, and fell foul of the 1951 international treaty covering handling of asylum.
“UNHCR’s position has always been for all asylum seekers arriving into Australian territory, by whatever means, and wherever, to be given access to a full and efficient refugee status determination process in Australia. This would be consistent with general practice, and in line with international refugee law,” said Volker Turk, its head of international protection.
“If asylum seekers are transferred to another country, the legal responsibility for those asylum seekers may in some circumstances be shared with that other country,” he added.
UNHCR underlined that it had found “serious shortcomings” at asylum centres in Nauru and Papua New Guinea, including conditions and processing delays.
The agency said it was imperative that the more than 18,000 asylum seekers who have arrived by boat to Australia since 13 August 2012 be provided with a fair and effective asylum procedure.
Any detention of asylum seekers must be strictly in accordance with Australia’s refugee and human rights law obligations, it added.
Australia argued that the change was needed to strip away any advantage gained by asylum seekers who arrive on the mainland, where boat people increasingly have been heading to avoid detention.
Most boats land at or are intercepted near the remote Australian territories of Christmas Island, close to Indonesia’s Java, or the Cocos Islands in the Indian Ocean.
Both are considered to be “excised” from Australia for immigration purposes, meaning they are subject to special laws allowing for refugees who land there to be processed in regional centres in the Pacific.
Though refugees come in relatively small numbers by global standards, the issue is a political flashpoint in Australia and is expected to be a key issue in national elections in September.
Source: AFP – UN refugee agency faults Australia’s tough new policyRelated articles
- Australian mainland now off limits for asylum seekers (craighill.net)
- Boat people genuine refugees (theage.com.au)
- Advance Australia Fair (madeleinewhitby.wordpress.com)
- Australia gets tough on asylum-seekers (gulfnews.com)
- Australia Extends Reach of Tough Refugee Policy (thejakartaglobe.com)
- Asylum seeker to be freed after ASIO overturns adverse security assessment (abc.net.au)
- Out of sight, out of mind: excising Australia from the migration zone (theconversation.com)
- ‘Go Back to Where You Came From’ (gandhihadapoint.wordpress.com)
- Senate debates continent excise plan (news.theage.com.au)
- Human rights, not elections, must guide refugee policy (abc.net.au)
Craig Hill Media and Consulting 
The United Nations is more trouble than help. The sooner it is disbanded, the better off the entire globe will be. Go Australia
Posted by --Rick | May 24, 2013, 05:36