//
you're reading...
Australian Law and Politics

Senate Estimates And Other Parliamentary Committees


While the proceedings of Senate Estimates Committees are often reported as just another piece of political theatre, they do represent an important accountability mechanism.

Senator the Hon John Faulkner, Special Minister of State and Cabinet Secretary, has described Senate Estimates Committees as the “best accountability mechanism of any Australian Parliament” (Senate Hansard, 13 May 2004, p. 23209). It is difficult to take issue with the Senator’s sentiment.

The real issue for public servants who appear before Senate Estimates or other Parliamentary Committees, and the many more who prepare briefs for those who do appear, is how to best discharge their duties within the matrix of Parliamentary Committees processes. What follows is a high level survey of those processes.

Power to conduct inquiries

The powers of the Australian Parliament to conduct inquiries can be traced right back to England’s Bill of Rights of 1689. That power was enshrined in section 49 of our Constitution, which adopted all the powers, privileges, and immunities of the UK Parliament.

Both Houses of our Parliament clearly have the power to require people to attend, to give evidence, and to produce documents. That power supports the function of the Parliament of inquiring into matters of concern, before debating and legislating in respect of them. Both Houses may compel the attendance of witnesses, the answering of questions, and the production of documents using the power to punish disobedience – although, thankfully, that power is rarely used.

In practice, inquiries are usually conducted by Committees exercising delegated power of either the Senate or the House of Representatives. Inquiries normally proceed on a voluntary basis, with witnesses invited to make submissions, to produce other documents, and to appear and give oral evidence. The Senate will only compel a witness to appear or produce documents where the circumstances warrant such an order.

Protection of parliamentary privilege

Under the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987, the giving of evidence and the production of documents by a witness has the same legal status as a Senator’s participation in Senate proceedings. Those acts attract the protection of parliamentary privilege. This is a wide-ranging protection against prosecution, suit, examination or question before courts and tribunals.

Parliamentary privilege also protects witnesses from interference. Senate Standing Order 181 provides that: “a witness examined before the Senate or a Committee is entitled to the protection of the Senate in respect of the evidence of the witness”. This declaration demonstrates that the Senate will use its powers to protect witnesses against conceivable adverse consequences arising from their giving evidence.

Defence of public interest immunity

Neither House of Parliament has yet to formally decide whether it accepts that its authority is constrained by public interest immunity. The Senate has implicitly acknowledged that there is some information held by the Executive Government that should not be disclosed on grounds of public interest immunity:

  • subject to the determination of all just and proper claims of privilege which may be made by persons summoned, it is the obligation of all such persons to answer questions and produce documents; and
  • upon a claim of privilege based on an established ground being made to any question or to the production of any documents, the Senate shall consider and determine each such claim.

The Senate has made it clear that, while witnesses may object to giving evidence on the ground of public interest immunity, it reserves the right to conclusively determine whether a claim will be accepted.

Expectations of officials

The Senate has made a number of resolutions that are important to public servants about the application of its power of inquiry. For example, public servants are not to give opinions on matters of policy, and must be given reasonable opportunity to refer questions to a senior officer or a minister.

The first rule is designed to avoid officials becoming involved in discussion or dispute with Committee members about the merits of Government policy as determined by ministers. Officials may explain Government policy, contrast it with alternative policies, and explain how a particular policy was selected, but they may not be asked to give opinions on the relative merits of alternative policies. It is the role of ministers, not officials, to defend Government policy. The second rule about referring questions to a senior officer or a minister reflects two concerns:

  • first, that an official is not required to answer a question where all the necessary information may not be available to the official
  • secondly, if there is any difficulty in answering a question, the difficulty is referred to a senior officer, and if necessary, ultimately to a minister for resolution.

Particular processes of Estimates Committees

Estimates Committees’ scrutiny provides the primary opportunity for the Senate to assess the performance of the public service, its administration of Government policy and programs.

Senate Estimates Committees have the power to call witnesses and require the production of documents. Their hearings are required to be in public, and Estimates Committees are not empowered to receive confidential material in the absence of a specific resolution of the Senate to that effect. All material received by an Estimates Committee is automatically published.

The Senate has considered whether Estimates Committees should be able to take evidence in camera, but the Procedure Committee has on several occasions recommended against such a change, and the Senate has accepted those recommendations.

Estimates Committees may ask for explanations from ministers or officials relating to items of proposed expenditure. Usually the Committees leave it to the minister to determine which witnesses attend, although they have the power to call particular witnesses. In practice, however, ministers agree to the attendance of particular witnesses.

The only substantive rule of the Senate relating to the scope of questions is that questions must be relevant to the matters referred to the Committees, namely the estimates of expenditure. As the estimates represent agencies’ claims on the Commonwealth for funds, any questions about their operations or financial positions which shape those claims are also considered relevant by Estimates Committees.

Armed with this fundamental understanding of the processes of Senate and other Parliamentary Committees, those officers who are involved in those processes should be well placed to discharge their duties, while respecting the requirements of the Senate and, more broadly, the Parliament.

Original article by Clayton Utz Solicitors, Australia

About Craig Hill

Teacher and Writer. Writing has been cited in New York Times, BBC, Fox News, Aljazeera, Philippines Star, South China Morning Post, National Interest, news.com.au, Wikipedia and others.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

If you liked what you just read, click "Subscribe" to become a follower of the Craig Hill site. You will receive an email each time a new post is published.

Join 15,358 other followers

An archive of all my old posts

Follow me on Twitter

Most Recent Posts Post on My Blog About China: China News

China’s new aircraft carrier Fujian: Hit or miss 

China’s new aircraft carrier Fujian: Hit or miss 

While the United States was wrapping up its Valiant Shield 2022 exercise on 17 June, China launched its third aircraft carrier with all the fanfare. The launch was postponed twice due to logistical and technical issues. The aircraft carrier has been named Fujian with the hull number 18. It has been under construction at the world’s largest […]

In Beijing’s BRICS summit, Putin is back on the world stage

In Beijing’s BRICS summit, Putin is back on the world stage

When Russian President Vladimir Putin dials into the virtual BRICS summit hosted by Beijing on Thursday, it will be his first time attending a forum with the heads of major economies since launching an invasion of Ukraine earlier this year. For Putin, this could offer a welcome picture: his face beamed onscreen alongside other leaders […]

U.S. not seeking to create “Asian NATO,” defense secretary says

U.S. not seeking to create “Asian NATO,” defense secretary says

The U.S. Defense Secretary emphasized partnership as the main priority for the American security strategy in the Indo-Pacific during a keynote speech on Saturday. However, Lloyd Austin stressed that the U.S. does not seek to create “an Asian NATO.” Austin spoke for half an hour at the First Plenary Session of the Shangri-La Dialogue 2022 […]

Why Chinese warplanes are ‘playing chicken’ with US allies

Why Chinese warplanes are ‘playing chicken’ with US allies

Chinese warplanes are targeting US allies in a high-stakes “game of chicken” over the Asia-Pacific that risks spiraling out of control — raising the risk of an incident that could spark war. That is the view of analysts who warn increasingly aggressive maneuvers by Chinese fighter jets — accused of endangering both Canadian and Australian […]

Has China lost Europe?

Has China lost Europe?

In April and May, as Russia’s war in Ukraine entered its third month, China sent a special envoy to meet with officials in eight central and eastern European countries. The timing was not coincidental: in the two months since Russia had launched its invasion, China’s standing in Europe had sunk to new lows. European governments […]

Xi’s re-election: Opportunity for the world, curse for China

Xi’s re-election: Opportunity for the world, curse for China

China is gearing up for the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party to be held later this year. According to the consensus view, President Xi Jinping’s historic bid for a third term as the party’s General Secretary is assured. The Chinese President and General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Xi Jinping, doesn’t have much […]

China: A political view

China: A political view

I read Dr Mohamad Zreik[2] interesting and comprehensive article on the growth of China’s economy. It has come a long way since the days of Mao Tse Tung and the days of his communist experiment, the Long March, when millions died. The years that followed Mao set the path from which the economy took off […]

Math books outrage China with ‘ugly, sexually suggestive, pro-American’ images

Math books outrage China with ‘ugly, sexually suggestive, pro-American’ images

China has ordered a nationwide review of school textbooks after illustrations deemed ugly, sexually suggestive and secretly pro-American caused public uproar. The news has alarmed some experts and parents who fear the campaign is turning into a political witch hunt and represents an unnecessary tightening of the country’s already stringent censorship of cultural publications. The […]

Why Biden didn’t mean what he said about Taiwan

Why Biden didn’t mean what he said about Taiwan

The White House has been left scrambling a little after President Joe Biden suggested on May 23, 2022, that the US would intervene militarily should China attempt an invasion of Taiwan. The comment, which Biden made during a trip to Japan, was taken by some observers as a deviation from the official US line on […]

United States outmanoeuvres Russia once again? 

United States outmanoeuvres Russia once again? 

In a recent briefing, the US Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Avril Haines warned, “I would characterize it as the Russians aren’t winning, and the Ukrainians aren’t winning, and we’re at a bit of a stalemate here.” So, where is the Russia-Ukraine war heading? What is Russian President Putin planning next? Is Europe ready for […]

%d bloggers like this: