you're reading...
Australian Law and Politics

Senate Estimates And Other Parliamentary Committees

While the proceedings of Senate Estimates Committees are often reported as just another piece of political theatre, they do represent an important accountability mechanism.

Senator the Hon John Faulkner, Special Minister of State and Cabinet Secretary, has described Senate Estimates Committees as the “best accountability mechanism of any Australian Parliament” (Senate Hansard, 13 May 2004, p. 23209). It is difficult to take issue with the Senator’s sentiment.

The real issue for public servants who appear before Senate Estimates or other Parliamentary Committees, and the many more who prepare briefs for those who do appear, is how to best discharge their duties within the matrix of Parliamentary Committees processes. What follows is a high level survey of those processes.

Power to conduct inquiries

The powers of the Australian Parliament to conduct inquiries can be traced right back to England’s Bill of Rights of 1689. That power was enshrined in section 49 of our Constitution, which adopted all the powers, privileges, and immunities of the UK Parliament.

Both Houses of our Parliament clearly have the power to require people to attend, to give evidence, and to produce documents. That power supports the function of the Parliament of inquiring into matters of concern, before debating and legislating in respect of them. Both Houses may compel the attendance of witnesses, the answering of questions, and the production of documents using the power to punish disobedience – although, thankfully, that power is rarely used.

In practice, inquiries are usually conducted by Committees exercising delegated power of either the Senate or the House of Representatives. Inquiries normally proceed on a voluntary basis, with witnesses invited to make submissions, to produce other documents, and to appear and give oral evidence. The Senate will only compel a witness to appear or produce documents where the circumstances warrant such an order.

Protection of parliamentary privilege

Under the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987, the giving of evidence and the production of documents by a witness has the same legal status as a Senator’s participation in Senate proceedings. Those acts attract the protection of parliamentary privilege. This is a wide-ranging protection against prosecution, suit, examination or question before courts and tribunals.

Parliamentary privilege also protects witnesses from interference. Senate Standing Order 181 provides that: “a witness examined before the Senate or a Committee is entitled to the protection of the Senate in respect of the evidence of the witness”. This declaration demonstrates that the Senate will use its powers to protect witnesses against conceivable adverse consequences arising from their giving evidence.

Defence of public interest immunity

Neither House of Parliament has yet to formally decide whether it accepts that its authority is constrained by public interest immunity. The Senate has implicitly acknowledged that there is some information held by the Executive Government that should not be disclosed on grounds of public interest immunity:

  • subject to the determination of all just and proper claims of privilege which may be made by persons summoned, it is the obligation of all such persons to answer questions and produce documents; and
  • upon a claim of privilege based on an established ground being made to any question or to the production of any documents, the Senate shall consider and determine each such claim.

The Senate has made it clear that, while witnesses may object to giving evidence on the ground of public interest immunity, it reserves the right to conclusively determine whether a claim will be accepted.

Expectations of officials

The Senate has made a number of resolutions that are important to public servants about the application of its power of inquiry. For example, public servants are not to give opinions on matters of policy, and must be given reasonable opportunity to refer questions to a senior officer or a minister.

The first rule is designed to avoid officials becoming involved in discussion or dispute with Committee members about the merits of Government policy as determined by ministers. Officials may explain Government policy, contrast it with alternative policies, and explain how a particular policy was selected, but they may not be asked to give opinions on the relative merits of alternative policies. It is the role of ministers, not officials, to defend Government policy. The second rule about referring questions to a senior officer or a minister reflects two concerns:

  • first, that an official is not required to answer a question where all the necessary information may not be available to the official
  • secondly, if there is any difficulty in answering a question, the difficulty is referred to a senior officer, and if necessary, ultimately to a minister for resolution.

Particular processes of Estimates Committees

Estimates Committees’ scrutiny provides the primary opportunity for the Senate to assess the performance of the public service, its administration of Government policy and programs.

Senate Estimates Committees have the power to call witnesses and require the production of documents. Their hearings are required to be in public, and Estimates Committees are not empowered to receive confidential material in the absence of a specific resolution of the Senate to that effect. All material received by an Estimates Committee is automatically published.

The Senate has considered whether Estimates Committees should be able to take evidence in camera, but the Procedure Committee has on several occasions recommended against such a change, and the Senate has accepted those recommendations.

Estimates Committees may ask for explanations from ministers or officials relating to items of proposed expenditure. Usually the Committees leave it to the minister to determine which witnesses attend, although they have the power to call particular witnesses. In practice, however, ministers agree to the attendance of particular witnesses.

The only substantive rule of the Senate relating to the scope of questions is that questions must be relevant to the matters referred to the Committees, namely the estimates of expenditure. As the estimates represent agencies’ claims on the Commonwealth for funds, any questions about their operations or financial positions which shape those claims are also considered relevant by Estimates Committees.

Armed with this fundamental understanding of the processes of Senate and other Parliamentary Committees, those officers who are involved in those processes should be well placed to discharge their duties, while respecting the requirements of the Senate and, more broadly, the Parliament.

Original article by Clayton Utz Solicitors, Australia

About Craig Hill

Teacher and Writer. Writing has been cited in New York Times, BBC, Fox News, Aljazeera, Philippines Star, South China Morning Post, National Interest, news.com.au, Wikipedia and others.


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

If you liked what you just read, click "Subscribe" to become a follower of the Craig Hill site. You will receive an email each time a new post is published.

Join 14,942 other followers

An archive of all my old posts

Follow me on Twitter

Most Recent Posts Post on My Blog About China: China News

Cadence Column: Asia, October 25, 2021

Cadence Column: Asia, October 25, 2021

Taiwan was thrust into a position without being asked. In 1971, the United Nations removed the Taipei-seated government known today as “Taiwan” and switched to recognizing the Beijing-based government known as “China”. The Taiwanese were elbowed out of the global forum. Now, the US is working to bring Taiwan back in, but not the same […]

China’s trade practices come under fire

China’s trade practices come under fire

China’s trade policies have come under strong criticism during a review at the World Trade Organization (WTO). The US accused China of “skewing the playing field” by using “unfair trade practices” such as preferential treatment for state businesses. Meanwhile Australia said the country’s behaviour was “inconsistent” with its WTO commitments. China said it was committed […]

China’s economy weakens, then gets even worse and now there’s a global shipping crisis. What’s next?

China’s economy weakens, then gets even worse and now there’s a global shipping crisis. What’s next?

The world is waking up to the fact that maybe being dependent upon China for its goods is not such a good idea. In 2019 at about the same time the US was closing on the trade deals with China, COVID emerged in China. In 2019 China’s economy was also beginning to slow down. COVID […]

U.S. needs nuclear spacecraft to compete with China, NASA official tells Congress

U.S. needs nuclear spacecraft to compete with China, NASA official tells Congress

A NASA official told Congress on Wednesday that the United States needs more nuclear spacecrafts in order to compete with China. “Strategic competitors including China are aggressively investing in a wide range of space technologies, including nuclear power and propulsion,” Bhavya Lal, NASA’s senior advisor for budget and finance, told the House Science, Space, and […]

China shows off drones recycled from Soviet-era fighter jets

China shows off drones recycled from Soviet-era fighter jets

China has for the first time showed off retired 1950s era fighter jets that have been converted to unmanned drones, with satellite photos of two of its east coast bases near Taiwan showing a large number of the jets on site. The People’s Liberation Army’s Eastern Theater Command published the photos of two Shenyang J-6s […]

China’s propaganda machine is intensifying its ‘people’s war’ to catch American spies

China’s propaganda machine is intensifying its ‘people’s war’ to catch American spies

“Let’s fight a ‘people’s war’ against the spies, so that they cannot move a single step and have no place to hide!” That was the rallying cry of a Chinese military newspaper on social media over the weekend, as Beijing urges public vigilance against American espionage following the launch of a CIA mission center dedicated […]

China’s blackouts break power cutoff pledge

China’s blackouts break power cutoff pledge

As China struggles to control the latest surge of power shortages, the government seems to be hoping that the public will have short memories for how it has dealt with similar problems in the past. After months of downplaying the power crisis and recommending partial fixes, central government authorities belatedly acknowledged the spread of electricity […]

Cadence Column: Asia, October 18, 2021

Cadence Column: Asia, October 18, 2021

According to Chinese and US claims, China has a high-orbit, hypersonic missile that can hit a target within 24 miles. And, that’s why China is the new boss of the world and everyone else should hate America. The end. But, that’s not the end in the mind of Taiwan or the US Pentagon. This week, […]

China ‘making its nuclear submarines harder to detect’

China ‘making its nuclear submarines harder to detect’

China is upgrading its nuclear missile-equipped submarines to make them harder for rival powers such as the US to detect, reports suggest. The People’s Liberation Army Navy has redesigned its type 094 submarines to make them quieter, The South China Morning Post reports. Defence experts believe the Chinese 094 submarine can carry and launch the […]

Could China’s economy collapse?

Could China’s economy collapse?

For almost half a century, Chinese officials have overseen one of the greatest economic transformations in human history. The country has gone from collectivized farms and famine to world-leading tech companies and gleaming megacities connected by superfast trains. More than 800 million Chinese have been pulled out of poverty as the Communist Party and its leader […]

%d bloggers like this: