//
you're reading...
Australian Law and Politics

Damages For A Risk Of Injury Where Damages Already Paid


In Muscat v Comcare [2008] AATA 872, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) considered whether an employee was entitled to compensation under the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (SRC Act) in circumstances where he had settled an action for damages against the Commonwealth in the Dust Diseases Tribunal of NSW (DDT).

In making its decision, the AAT looked at the nature of the settlement of the damages action and considered the concept of ‘injury’ for the purposes of the SRC Act.

PREVIOUS ACTION FOR DAMAGES

Mr Muscat had filed a statement of claim in the DDT on 25 August 1999 claiming damages for a number of injuries including, relevantly, asbestosis and increased risk of developing lung cancer.

As part of Mr Muscat’s claim, he sought an order for further damages pursuant to section 11A of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (DDT Act). Section 11A was noted to be a provision peculiar to the DDT which allowed Mr Muscat to re-open his claim for damages without having to re-visit the issue of liability if he developed certain nominated diseases, including lung cancer, in the future.

On the day of settlement of the damages action, in which judgment was entered against the Commonwealth in the sum of $165,000 inclusive of costs, an amended statement of claim was filed, which omitted any claim pursuant to section 11A of the DDT Act.

ISSUE BEFORE THE AAT

There was no dispute that Mr Muscat had developed lung cancer and that his exposure to asbestos, whilst employed by the Commonwealth, was a material contributing factor.

Comcare argued, however, that the settlement entered into by Mr Muscat in the DDT resulted in his receiving damages in respect of lung cancer and therefore section 48 of the SRC Act operated to prevent the payment of compensation under that Act.

Mr Muscat argued that any damages awarded for the increased risk of developing lung cancer were not damages ‘in respect of an injury in respect of which compensation was payable’.

The AAT was therefore required to consider whether Mr Muscat did recover damages in respect of an injury, lung cancer, in respect of which compensation was payable under the SRC Act.

AAT’S DECISION

The AAT noted that the SRC Act defined ‘injury’ as:

  • A disease suffered by an employee; or
  • An injury (other than a disease) suffered by an employee, that is a physical or mental injury arising out of, or in the course of, the employee’s employment.

The AAT referred to the High Court decision in Canute v Comcare (2006) 225 CLR 535 at 540 regarding the concept of ‘an injury’:

‘At this juncture, three things may be observed about the concept of ‘an injury’. First, the Act does not oblige Comcare to pay compensation in respect of an employee’s impairment; it is liable to pay compensation in respect of ‘the injury’. Secondly, the term ‘injury’ is not used in the Act in the sense of ‘workplace accident’. The definition of ‘injury’ is expressed in terms of the resultant effect of an incident or ailment upon the employee’s body. Further, the term ‘injury’ is not used in a global sense to describe the general condition of the employee following an incident. The Act refers disjunctively to ‘disease’ or ‘physical or mental’ injuries and, at least to that extent, it assumes that an employee may sustain more than one ‘injury”.

The AAT accepted that, at common law, damages could not be assessed until actual loss or damage was suffered: Scarcella v Lettice and Anor (2000-01) 51 NSWLR 302 at 306.

The AAT also considered the phrase ‘in respect of’, which was held by Justices Deane, Dawson and Toohey in Workers’ Compensation Board of Queensland v Technical Products Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 642 at 653 to ‘[gather] meaning from the context in which it appears and it is that context which will determine the matters to which it extends’. The AAT quoted the following passage from that decision:

‘The most that can be drawn from these decisions dealing with differently worded provisions is that the use of the phrase ‘in respect of’ does not, of itself, extend the meaning of an expression such as ‘damages in respect of injury to any worker’ so as to include damages payable to a person other than the worker’.

The AAT considered that the passage could be rephrased to state that the phrase ‘in respect of’ does not of itself extend the concept of injury as a result of one disease, for example, asbestosis to another disease, namely lung cancer, although both had the same cause, being exposure to asbestos.

It was held that the head of damage in the statement of claim, the risk of developing lung cancer, was peculiar to the DDT and could not affect the definition of ‘injury’ under the SRC Act.

The AAT found that the decision in Canute made it clear that ‘injury’ in the terms of the SRC Act means ‘the resultant effect of an incident upon an employee’s body’ and that in Mr Muscat’s case the injuries were asbestosis and lung cancer. The AAT was not satisfied that the damages received by the employee in the DDT for a head of damage otherwise unquantifiable, being a risk of injury, did not result in part of the damages being awarded ‘in respect of’ the actual injury when it did occur.

The AAT therefore determined that Mr Muscat was entitled to compensation for permanent impairment resulting from the disease of lung cancer, assessed at 70% whole person impairment, and that he was also entitled to weekly compensation pursuant to section 19 on the basis of a total incapacity for work (and that section 23(1A) of the SRC Act applied).

About Craig Hill

Teacher and Writer. Writing has been cited in New York Times, BBC, Fox News, Aljazeera, Philippines Star, South China Morning Post, National Interest, news.com.au, Wikipedia and others.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

If you liked what you just read, click "Subscribe" to become a follower of the Craig Hill site. You will receive an email each time a new post is published.

Join 15,358 other followers

An archive of all my old posts

Follow me on Twitter

Most Recent Posts Post on My Blog About China: China News

China’s new aircraft carrier Fujian: Hit or miss 

China’s new aircraft carrier Fujian: Hit or miss 

While the United States was wrapping up its Valiant Shield 2022 exercise on 17 June, China launched its third aircraft carrier with all the fanfare. The launch was postponed twice due to logistical and technical issues. The aircraft carrier has been named Fujian with the hull number 18. It has been under construction at the world’s largest […]

In Beijing’s BRICS summit, Putin is back on the world stage

In Beijing’s BRICS summit, Putin is back on the world stage

When Russian President Vladimir Putin dials into the virtual BRICS summit hosted by Beijing on Thursday, it will be his first time attending a forum with the heads of major economies since launching an invasion of Ukraine earlier this year. For Putin, this could offer a welcome picture: his face beamed onscreen alongside other leaders […]

U.S. not seeking to create “Asian NATO,” defense secretary says

U.S. not seeking to create “Asian NATO,” defense secretary says

The U.S. Defense Secretary emphasized partnership as the main priority for the American security strategy in the Indo-Pacific during a keynote speech on Saturday. However, Lloyd Austin stressed that the U.S. does not seek to create “an Asian NATO.” Austin spoke for half an hour at the First Plenary Session of the Shangri-La Dialogue 2022 […]

Why Chinese warplanes are ‘playing chicken’ with US allies

Why Chinese warplanes are ‘playing chicken’ with US allies

Chinese warplanes are targeting US allies in a high-stakes “game of chicken” over the Asia-Pacific that risks spiraling out of control — raising the risk of an incident that could spark war. That is the view of analysts who warn increasingly aggressive maneuvers by Chinese fighter jets — accused of endangering both Canadian and Australian […]

Has China lost Europe?

Has China lost Europe?

In April and May, as Russia’s war in Ukraine entered its third month, China sent a special envoy to meet with officials in eight central and eastern European countries. The timing was not coincidental: in the two months since Russia had launched its invasion, China’s standing in Europe had sunk to new lows. European governments […]

Xi’s re-election: Opportunity for the world, curse for China

Xi’s re-election: Opportunity for the world, curse for China

China is gearing up for the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party to be held later this year. According to the consensus view, President Xi Jinping’s historic bid for a third term as the party’s General Secretary is assured. The Chinese President and General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Xi Jinping, doesn’t have much […]

China: A political view

China: A political view

I read Dr Mohamad Zreik[2] interesting and comprehensive article on the growth of China’s economy. It has come a long way since the days of Mao Tse Tung and the days of his communist experiment, the Long March, when millions died. The years that followed Mao set the path from which the economy took off […]

Math books outrage China with ‘ugly, sexually suggestive, pro-American’ images

Math books outrage China with ‘ugly, sexually suggestive, pro-American’ images

China has ordered a nationwide review of school textbooks after illustrations deemed ugly, sexually suggestive and secretly pro-American caused public uproar. The news has alarmed some experts and parents who fear the campaign is turning into a political witch hunt and represents an unnecessary tightening of the country’s already stringent censorship of cultural publications. The […]

Why Biden didn’t mean what he said about Taiwan

Why Biden didn’t mean what he said about Taiwan

The White House has been left scrambling a little after President Joe Biden suggested on May 23, 2022, that the US would intervene militarily should China attempt an invasion of Taiwan. The comment, which Biden made during a trip to Japan, was taken by some observers as a deviation from the official US line on […]

United States outmanoeuvres Russia once again? 

United States outmanoeuvres Russia once again? 

In a recent briefing, the US Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Avril Haines warned, “I would characterize it as the Russians aren’t winning, and the Ukrainians aren’t winning, and we’re at a bit of a stalemate here.” So, where is the Russia-Ukraine war heading? What is Russian President Putin planning next? Is Europe ready for […]

%d bloggers like this: